Interview with three snipers of the 3.Geb.Div.
This is a summary of an interview with two of the „most successfull“
snipers within the Wehrmacht. To obtain a wide coverage of experiences a third
also very good sniper joined.
The fact that those three soldiers had a really good
training and many experiences they are able to give exact and informative
answers to the questions.
During the interview they will be named A,
B and C. They were all in the 3.Gebirgsdivision during the war.
Short information about the interrogated.
A:
Matthias H. from Tirol was from 1943 to end of war on the Eastern front,
with 345 confirmed kills the most successfull sniper in the Wehrmacht.
B:
Sepp A. from Salzburg was from
December 1942 to the end of war on the eastern front, with 257 confirmed kills
the second in the ranking.
C:
Helmut W. from Styria was from
September 1942 to the end of war on the eastern front, with 64 confirmed kills.
(after he was wounded he was an instructor)
What equipment did you use?:
A: K 98 with 6x telescope, G 43 with 4x telescope
B: captured russian sniper rifle with telescope, K 98
with 6x
C: K 98 with 1 ½x and 4x telescope, G 43 with 4x
telescope.
What scopes did you use?
A: a 4x scope was usefull up to 400m, a 6x was good up to
1000m
B: had 2 years a russian sniper rifle and can´t remember
the exact type of the scope and worked well. On the K 98 I used a 6x.
C: The 1 ½x was not efficient and was replaced by the
better working 6x.
What do you think about a high
magnification?
A,B: 6x is enough, there was no need for a higher one
and no experience with higher.
C: 4x is sufficient for the most missions.
Up to what distances you could hit
the following targets easily?
Head: A,B,C: up
to about 400m
Breast:
A: up to 600m B,C: up to 400m
person standing:
A: 700m to 800m B,C: about 600m
Are these distances valid for you
personaly, just the best or all snipers?
A,B: just for the best snipers
C: for me in person but also for most of the german
snipers. Some cracks hit also at higher distances.
B: says additionally: a real 100% hit is just possible up
to 600m.
What was the most far away target you
shot at and what was it?
A: It was a standing soldier in about 1100m distance. At
this distance it was unlikely to hit but we wanted to show the enemy that he was
not save at this distance. Also we wanted to proof our skill to the officers.
B: 400m to 700m
C: 600m, if there was a target further away I waited
until it got in range because it was easier to hit and the confirmation was
better to get. The G 43 had a poor balistic and so I fired just up to 500m with
it.
How many second shots were necessary
out of ten?
A: nearly no second shot ever needed.
B: 1 or 2. a second shot was very dangerous in situations
with enemy snipers
C: . 1 or 2 at highest.
If you could choose. What rifle would
you prefer?
a)
multiloading
rifle like K 98:
A:
K98
because of the high long term precision.
B:
K98
C:
K98
b)
self
loading rifle like G43:
A:
No
G43 because just good up to 400m and no good precision.
B:
No G43, too heavy.
C:
Yes,
because it was reliable and not more bad than the K98.
If you could choose today between a self loading rifle with the same
precision than the K98 and the K98 what would you choose?
A:
I
would choose the K98 because a sniper that is brought into action as a sniper
does not need a self loading rifle.
B:
If it has the same weight....self loader.
C:
self loader could fire faster when attacked.
How
were you attached to your units?
All of them belonged to the snipergroup of the Btl.; C
was the commander of it. It was up to 22 men strong of which six were
permanent with the Btl., the rest was attached to the companies. observation
results, use of ammo and kills were reported daily to the Btl.HQ.
In the beginning the missions were ordered by the Btl. during the war
when good snipers got lesser they were sometimes ordered by the division HQ.
In every company there were some soldiers equiped with scopes but had no
special training. They hit reliable up to 400m and did a very good job Those
soldiers didi their normal duty within the companies and were not able to get
that high „kill-rate“ than the real snipers.
Tactics
and targets?
a)
Attack:
A,B,C:
always in teams of two men. One shoots the other observing. Most common
missions: destroying enemy observers (hevy weapons), commanders. Sometimes
targets like AT-positions, M.G.-positions and so on. The snipers followed the
attacking forces and fighted the hardest enemy positions. (guncrews and so on).
A:
saya aditionally: I had to sneak through the enemy HKL prior to our attack to
fight enemy commanders and guncrews during our own artillery preparation fire.
b)
attack
by night:
A,B,C:
We did not fight during night because snipers were too precious.
c)
attack
in winter:
A:
I went behind the attacking forces with a winter-camo-suite to fight against
M.G. and A.T. positions that hold the attack.
B,C:
Good
camo-suite and warm clothing needed otherwise no longer observation possible.
d)
defense
A,B,C:
mostly
free „hunting“ in the company sector. The order was either to fight all
targets or just „worth it“ targets. When the enemy attacked their commanders
were easily to identify because they had different equipment, camo-uniforms and
so on. So we shot them at high distances and so the enemy attack was stopped.
(On one day A
remembers
that he shot the commanding officers of eight attacks).
As soon as enemy snipers appear fight them until destroyed. These fights
against enemy snipers caused many losses within our ranks.
Snipers go on their position before sunrise and stay there wih short
breaks until sunset.
Sometimes if the way to the own position was exposed to the enemy two or
three days in this position without supply.
e)
defense
by night
A,B,C:
No
snipers were used during night. They were not issued to guarding duties or
something. Sometimes they built up a position during the night to be ready by
day.
f)
did
you have a kill by moonlight?
A:
Yes
if the moonlight was strong enough and I used the 6x scope it was possible. Not
with the backsight.
B,C:
No
g)
delaying
fight:
A,C:
mostly 4 to 6 snipers that shot at every enemy soldier that appeared. At these
rear guards the machine-guns were not often used because one or two shots from a
sniper delayed the enemy for a long time and the own positions were not so
easily seen.
B:
No experience. In this situation everybody shoots at everything.
With
what tactic did you have the most success?
A:
The
success of a sniper was not mesured by the men he killed but on the effect he
caused to the enemy. For example if the enemy looses the commanding officers of
the attack the attack must be stopped. The highest number of kills we had of
course in defense positions when the enemy attacked several times a day.
B:
in defense because the other kills were not confirmed.
C:
biggest
success at longer period static warfare due to good observation possibilities.
Percentage of kills for each distance:
up
to 400m: A: 65% C: 80%
up
to 600m: A: 30% C: 20%
up
to 800m: rest
A:
says
aditionally: The 65% percent under 400m were not because of the shooting range
but it was easier to see if it is a „worth-it“ target or not. So I often waited until I could indentify the target.
B:
cannot remember the percentage but most of the targets were under 600m.
C:
did
most shots under 400m because this was a secure distance and it was easy to see
if it was a hit or not.
How
many shots did you fire from one position?
a)
attack:
A,B,C:
as many as necessary
b)
defense
from built position:
A,B,C:
1
to 3 at highest.
c)
enemy
assault:
A,B,C:
every
„worth-it“ target.
d)
fight
against enemy snipers:
A,B,C:
1
or 2
e)
delaying
fight
A,B,C:
1
or 2 were enough because the sniper was not alone.
B:
says
aditionally: on attack or enemy attack no kills were confirmed.
What
else is important besides excellent shooting?
A:
besides
the normal skills of a sniper the cleverness always wins. The „small-tactic“
of a man wins in in battle. To get a high kill rate it is also important that
the sniper is not used for other duties besides sniping.
B:
calmness,
superiority, courage.
C:
patience
and endurance, excellent ability of observation.
Out
of what persons snipers were recruited?
A:
just
born „single-fighters“ like hunters, poachers and so on.
B:
Can´t remember. I had 27 kills with my russian rifle before I was issued to the
sniper training.
C:
just
combat experienced soldiers with excellent shooting skills and two year duty
were issued to the sniper training.
What
sniper-courses did you attend?
A,B,C:
The
sniper course on the Tüpl Seetaleralpe.
C:
I
was there as an instructor then.
Was
the binocular usefull and what magnification did it have?
A:
It
was a 6x30 but that was not enough for higher distances. Got a 10x50 lateron and
this was good.
B:
The
binocular is as necessary as the scope on the rifle.
C:
Each sniper had a binocular and that was necessary. Up to 500m the 6x30 was
enough.
Would
you prefer a periscope to observe out of a trench?
A:
it
was a good addition. we had a russain one.
B:
No
C:
if
captured it was used.
Were
there scissor-telescopes in use?
A,C:
Yes
sometimes we used it with the artillery observer.
B:
No
What
kind of camouflage did you use?
A,B,C:
Camo-suites,
painted face and hands, rifle camo in winter with blenket and paint.
B:
says
aditionally: I used a umbrella for two years. I painted it like the sorrounding.
In the beginning I painted my hands and the face very carefully, at the end not
any more.
Did
you use other things to deceive the enemy?
A:
Yes,
for example puppets and so on.
B:
Yes,
for example fake positions with rifles fired by a wire construction.
C:
No
Did
you use some kind of shield?
A,B,C:
No
What
do you think about light cartridges?
A,B,C:
should
not be used in combat because the own position should not be shown.
They were used in training and to test the rifle. Also some were with
every sniper to test the range.
Did you use so called observer cartridges, that means cartridges that
explode when they hit the ground?
A,B,C:
Yes,
a small flame appears when it hits so you could see were you shot. We used them
also to inflame wooden building to get the enemy out of it.
They were used up to a range of 600m.
How
did you handle the sidewind?
A:
feeling
and experience, sometimes checked with light cartridges. The training on the
Seetaleralpe was very good because there was very often wind.
B:
feeling,
if there was to heavy wind we did not shoot.
C:
we
didn´t shoot if there was wind.
Do
you still remember the guidelines for firing on moving targets?
A,B,C:
No,
feeling, experience, fast targeting and fast shot.
Did
you use AT-rifles?
A:
Yes,
knocked out some guncrews through their shield. It was possible to hit a target
up to 300m because it was not so precise. Very heavy and not usefull for
snipers. Did not use it against soft targets.
B,C:
No
How
did you get a kill confirmed?
A,B,C:
Either
through a officer or two soldiers that observed the kill.
So the number of confirmed kills is much lower than the real number of
kills.